[1.3.1] KSP Interstellar Extended (KSPIE) 1.16.1 (20-10-2017) SUPPORT / RELEASE THREAD

Just a thought. Many of the various share-alike licenses are a bit vague on how exactly you should give credit. I can see there's credit given for much in an early post here;

That alone probably took a bit of compiling. I think (seeing as many people would be grabbing this without ever seeing the forum posts) that including the text (I would hazard a completely un-official legal opinion, with no weight) without any of the hyperlinking etc in the license text file that's part of the mod would solve many grey areas about whether attribution was given. The license files are generally included with mods, because that way they get moved around with the mods, even when dodgy sites re-upload them (I've had that happen, great fun), or whatever. So, it solves the issue of "did you include a note of the original license" that seems to always be in the creative commons type license stuff.

I personally, like the idea someone's used some assets of mine. I only started getting fussy when there was a site uploading old copies of things, often with the wrong info. But re-use in a different mod doesn't worry me, and @FreeThinker has clearly aimed at attributing sources. I just think putting the license in the text file avoids possible excrements. For a bunch of reasons.

end of my 2c

Carry on.[1.3.1] KSP Interstellar Extended (KSPIE) 1.16.1 (20-10-2017) SUPPORT / RELEASE THREAD

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit this link to stop these emails: http://zpr.io/nfAVj