Let's Rebalance the Tech Tree

Yeah, crew parts would require a certain number of medical science points, for example. That or there would be cumulative accounts of what missions you had flown, and how them would impact your understanding of kerbal factors. With life support in the mix, this would become a rationale for extended orbital flights to improve life support. The difference between more closed loop systems and open loop systems are typical a trade off of complexity vs mass. bring everything open loop, or save the raw materials via recycling, at the expense of more complex systems (possible failures).

For me, it's about meaningful design choices. If you knew your LF might fail, would you send 2 of everything, for example, or 1 craft with backup LS systems?Let's Rebalance the Tech Tree

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit this link to stop these emails: http://zpr.io/nfAVj