The international fight over users privacy and right to encryption vs. governments and law enforcement is really heating up now.
A BRAZILIAN STATE JUDGE ordered mobile phone operators to block nationwide the extremely popular WhatsApp chat service for 72 hours, a move that will have widespread international reverberations for the increasingly contentious debate over encryption and online privacy.
WhatsApp is the most-used app in Brazil, a country of 200 million people (it is now owned by Facebook, the countrys second-most used app). An estimated 91 percent of Brazilian mobile users nationwide more than 100 million individuals use WhatsApp to communicate with one another for free (it has 900 million active daily users around the world).
This ruling comes from the same judge, Marcel Maia Montalvão, of a small town in Sergipe state, who two months ago ordered Facebooks vice president for Latin America, Diego Dzodan, to be detained over WhatsApps failure to cooperate with a subpoena issued as part of a criminal investigation. The judge said the arrest was justified by Facebooks repeatedly failing to comply with judicial orders in a drug-trafficking case. Pursuant to that order, Dzodan was arrested by federal police and held in custody for a full day, until an appellate court overturned the order.
Afterward, the Facebook executive insisted that the way that information is encrypted from one cellphone to another, there is no information stored that could be handed over to authorities. WhatsApp similarly said: WhatsApp cannot provide information we do not have.
It's been clear for a while that governments and politicians are completely oblivious to how encryption works, and don't understand most technologies. For that reason this is just going to get worse as they flail wildly trying to pass laws and make rulings that are impossible to comply with because they have no idea what they're talking about and most seem unwilling to simply ask the experts and actually learn.
Do cases like this make you want to encrypt and protect your info from law enforcement and the government even more so...even though you have nothing to hide?
Quote:
A BRAZILIAN STATE JUDGE ordered mobile phone operators to block nationwide the extremely popular WhatsApp chat service for 72 hours, a move that will have widespread international reverberations for the increasingly contentious debate over encryption and online privacy.
WhatsApp is the most-used app in Brazil, a country of 200 million people (it is now owned by Facebook, the countrys second-most used app). An estimated 91 percent of Brazilian mobile users nationwide more than 100 million individuals use WhatsApp to communicate with one another for free (it has 900 million active daily users around the world).
This ruling comes from the same judge, Marcel Maia Montalvão, of a small town in Sergipe state, who two months ago ordered Facebooks vice president for Latin America, Diego Dzodan, to be detained over WhatsApps failure to cooperate with a subpoena issued as part of a criminal investigation. The judge said the arrest was justified by Facebooks repeatedly failing to comply with judicial orders in a drug-trafficking case. Pursuant to that order, Dzodan was arrested by federal police and held in custody for a full day, until an appellate court overturned the order.
Afterward, the Facebook executive insisted that the way that information is encrypted from one cellphone to another, there is no information stored that could be handed over to authorities. WhatsApp similarly said: WhatsApp cannot provide information we do not have.
Do cases like this make you want to encrypt and protect your info from law enforcement and the government even more so...even though you have nothing to hide?
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire