Does the Hobby Lobby ruling now mean that Shareholders are no longer seperate?

This questions is just about the legality of the ruling. I'm not interested in discussing the politics of if.



My question is..



Corporate protection is a separation of shareholders from liability of the corporation. That the corporation is a separate entity.



Now that it has been ruled that the shareholders ARE the corporation therefore giving the corporation the same speech and religious rights of the shareholders, doesn't that mean that the liability is no longer separate?



If they are now one and the same, how will any shareholder claim separate protection when it comes to legal action against the corporation?